Bryndza vs Korbáčik uzený
Overall, Bryndza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bryndza | Korbáčik uzený |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bryndza has 10% fewer calories (270 kcal vs 301 kcal).
- Korbáčik uzený has 12% less saturated fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Korbáčik uzený has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Bryndza has 59% less salt (2.4 g vs 5.9 g).
- Korbáčik uzený has 41% more protein (27 g vs 16 g).
- Bryndza has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bryndza
Érlelt juhgomolya (juhtej) (érlelt juhgomolya pasztőrizált juhtejből, érlelt juhgomolya nyers juhtejből), tehéngomolya (tej), ivóvíz, étkezés só.
Korbáčik uzený
Pasterizované mléko, jedlá sůl, sýrařské kultury, syřidlo, chlorid vápenatý, kouřové aroma, kouř z bukových pilin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bryndza or Korbáčik uzený?
Overall, Bryndza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bryndza has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Korbáčik uzený has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.