Bryndza vs Oravsky korbacik
Overall, Oravsky korbacik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bryndza | Oravsky korbacik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 15.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 10.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 28.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oravsky korbacik has 33% less fat (15.3 g vs 23 g).
- Oravsky korbacik has 38% less saturated fat (10.5 g vs 17 g).
- Oravsky korbacik has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Oravsky korbacik has 44% more protein (28.7 g vs 16 g).
- Only Bryndza lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Bryndza
Érlelt juhgomolya (juhtej) (érlelt juhgomolya pasztőrizált juhtejből, érlelt juhgomolya nyers juhtejből), tehéngomolya (tej), ivóvíz, étkezés só.
Oravsky korbacik
Mliekarenský syr, jedlá soľ. Sušina najmenej 43%. Tuk v sušine nejmenej 25%. Obsah NaCl max. 4,5%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bryndza or Oravsky korbacik?
Overall, Oravsky korbacik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oravsky korbacik has fewer calories: 264 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oravsky korbacik has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.