Comparison

Branston Original Pickle vs Old El Paso Jalapenos

Overall, Old El Paso Jalapenos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBranston Original PickleOld El Paso Jalapenos
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 133 kcal 20 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 33.3 g 2 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber 2 g —
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives21
AllergensGluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Old El Paso Jalapenos has 85% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 133 kcal).
  • Old El Paso Jalapenos has 94% less sugar (2 g vs 33.3 g).
  • Branston Original Pickle has 27% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Old El Paso Jalapenos has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Old El Paso Jalapenos has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Old El Paso Jalapenos is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Branston Original Pickle lists: Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Branston Original Pickle

mixed vegetables (carrot, rutabaga, onion, cauliflower, marrow, gherkin), sugar, vinegar, malt (barley, vinegar, eau-de-vie, salt, chopped dates (with flour of rice), potatoes (preservative: sulphur dioxide), modified corn starch, tomato paste, e150d, spices, concentrated lemon juice, onion powder, garlic extract,

Old El Paso Jalapenos

Green jalapeno peppers, water, salt, acidity regulator: acetic acid

FAQ

Which is healthier: Branston Original Pickle or Old El Paso Jalapenos?

Overall, Old El Paso Jalapenos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Old El Paso Jalapenos has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Old El Paso Jalapenos has less sugar: 2 g versus 33.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons