Comparison

Bovril Beef vs Caldo Cocido

Overall, Caldo Cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBovril BeefCaldo Cocido
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 252 kcal 4 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0.5 g
Salt 7.5 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.8 g 0 g
Protein 38 g 0 g
Additives40
AllergensCelery, GlutenCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caldo Cocido has 98% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 252 kcal).
  • Caldo Cocido has no fat, while Bovril Beef has 0.8 g.
  • Caldo Cocido has no saturated fat, while Bovril Beef has 0.4 g.
  • Caldo Cocido has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Caldo Cocido has 88% less salt (0.9 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Bovril Beef has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Bovril Beef has 100% more protein (38 g vs 0 g).
  • Caldo Cocido has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Bovril Beef lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Bovril Beef

beef broth (50%) [water, beef bones), yeast extract (27%) [contains barley, wheat, oats, rye], salt, water, colour (ammonia caramel), corn starch, beef powder (1%), flavour enhancers (disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate), acid (lactic acid), flavourings (contain celery). may contain egg, milk, mustard.

Caldo Cocido

Agua, pollo 1,1%, sal, aromas, almidón, hortalizas 0,2% (apio, puerro, cebolla y zanahoria), grasa bovina, extracto de carne, aceite de oliva, garbanzo 0,06%, especias, carne de bovino 0,02%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bovril Beef or Caldo Cocido?

Overall, Caldo Cocido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caldo Cocido has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caldo Cocido has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons