Bouillon de poule vs Bouillon de poule
Overall, Bouillon de poule has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bouillon de poule | Bouillon de poule |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 6 kcal | 275 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 6.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 51.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bouillon de poule has 98% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 275 kcal).
- Bouillon de poule has 98% less fat (0.4 g vs 19 g).
- Bouillon de poule has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 6.9 g).
- Bouillon de poule has no sugar, while Bouillon de poule has 6.8 g.
- Bouillon de poule has 98% less salt (1.1 g vs 51.2 g).
- Bouillon de poule has 48% more fiber (2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Bouillon de poule has 98% more protein (5.9 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Bouillon de poule
sel, amidon de maïs, miso, huiles végétales, graisse de poulet 5%, viande de poulet déshydratée 4,9%, légumes déshydratés 1,5%, épices
Bouillon de poule
sel, amidon de maïs, beurre de karité, graisse de poule 8 %, extrait de levure, sucre de canne, poudre de viande de poule 4,5 %, huile de tournesol, épices 1,9 % (noix de muscade, coriandre, curcuma), plantes aromatiques 1,2 % (persil, livèche, romarin), antioxydant: extrait de romarin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bouillon de poule or Bouillon de poule?
Overall, Bouillon de poule has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bouillon de poule has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 275 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bouillon de poule has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.