Bonne Maman - French Mandarin Jam, 370g (13oz) vs Mermelada de mandarina
Overall, Mermelada de mandarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Bonne Maman - French Mandarin Jam, 370g (13oz)
Mermelada de mandarina
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bonne Maman - French Mandari... | Mermelada de mandarina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 36.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | — |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mermelada de mandarina has 33% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Bonne Maman - French Mandarin Jam, 370g (13oz) has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Bonne Maman - French Mandarin Jam, 370g (13oz) has no saturated fat, while Mermelada de mandarina has 0.5 g.
- Mermelada de mandarina has 38% less sugar (36.8 g vs 59 g).
- Mermelada de mandarina has 57% more protein (0.7 g vs 0.3 g).
- Mermelada de mandarina has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bonne Maman - French Mandarin Jam, 370g (13oz)
sucre, mandarines, sucre roux de canne, jus de citron concentré et, éventuellement, gélifiant: pectine de fruits
Mermelada de mandarina
Mandarinas, azúcar de caña, pectina de frutas y ácido cítrico
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bonne Maman - French Mandarin Jam, 370g (13oz) or Mermelada de mandarina?
Overall, Mermelada de mandarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mermelada de mandarina has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mermelada de mandarina has less sugar: 36.8 g versus 59 g per 100 g.