Comparison

Blond chocolat blanc caramélisé vs Chocolate a la Taza Canela

Overall, Chocolate a la Taza Canela has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBlond chocolat blanc caramél...Chocolate a la Taza Canela
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 580 kcal 525 kcal
Fat 39 g 31 g
Saturated fat 24 g 20 g
Sugars 48 g 48 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 1.3 g
Protein 9.1 g 6 g
Additives22
AllergensMilk, SoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolate a la Taza Canela has 21% less fat (31 g vs 39 g).
  • Chocolate a la Taza Canela has 17% less saturated fat (20 g vs 24 g).
  • Chocolate a la Taza Canela has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Chocolate a la Taza Canela has 100% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Blond chocolat blanc caramélisé has 34% more protein (9.1 g vs 6 g).
  • Only Blond chocolat blanc caramélisé lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Blond chocolat blanc caramélisé

Beurre de cacao, sucre, lait entier en poudre, lait écrémé en poudre, lactosérum, matière grasse laitière anhydre, cacao maigre en poudre, émulsifiant : lécithines (soja), extrait de vanille, arôme naturel.

Chocolate a la Taza Canela

AZUCAR, PASTA DE CACAO, MANTECA DE CACAO, ALMIDÓN DE MAÍZ, EMULGENTE (LECITINA DE SOJA), CANELA (0,05%) Y AROMA (CANELA). CACAO: 45% MÍNIMO. PUEDE CONTENER TRAZAS DE LECHE, FRUTOS DE CÁSCARA Y CACAHUETE.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Blond chocolat blanc caramélisé or Chocolate a la Taza Canela?

Overall, Chocolate a la Taza Canela has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolate a la Taza Canela has fewer calories: 525 kcal versus 580 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Blond chocolat blanc caramélisé has less sugar: 48 g versus 48 g per 100 g.

More comparisons