Blanc vs Bourgogne 2015
Overall, Blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blanc | Bourgogne 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8.8 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blanc has 58% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- Blanc has 43% less sugar (8.8 g vs 15.5 g).
- Bourgogne 2015 has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Blanc
Wein (Trauben, Zucker, Konservierungstoff (SULFITE)), Zuckersirup, Fruchtinfusion, Alkohol, Chinarinden-Aufguss, Konservierungsstoff (SULFITE), Antioxidationsmittel (Ascorbinsäure)
Bourgogne 2015
raisin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blanc or Bourgogne 2015?
Overall, Blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blanc has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blanc has less sugar: 8.8 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.