Comparison
Bourgogne 2015 vs Vino blanco
Overall, Vino blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bourgogne 2015 | Vino blanco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Sulfitos |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vino blanco has no calories, while Bourgogne 2015 has 73 kcal.
- Vino blanco has no sugar, while Bourgogne 2015 has 15.5 g.
- Bourgogne 2015 has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Only Vino blanco lists: Sulfitos.
Ingredients
Bourgogne 2015
raisin
Vino blanco
Uvas, Conservantes y antioxidantes (sulfitos), Estabilizadores (ácido metatartárico, E456)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bourgogne 2015 or Vino blanco?
Overall, Vino blanco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vino blanco has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vino blanco has less sugar: 0 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.