Comparison

Biscuits sablés fourrés à la figue - x15 - Paquet de 165g vs Sultana framboise

Overall, Sultana framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBiscuits sablés fourrés à la...Sultana framboise
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 377 kcal 371 kcal
Fat 7.1 g 7.1 g
Saturated fat 2 g 0.7 g
Sugars 46 g 25.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.4 g
Fiber 4.7 g 6.3 g
Protein 5 g 5.3 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sultana framboise has 65% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Sultana framboise has 45% less sugar (25.5 g vs 46 g).
  • Sultana framboise has 25% more fiber (6.3 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Sultana framboise has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Biscuits sablés fourrés à la figue - x15 - Paquet de 165g lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Biscuits sablés fourrés à la figue - x15 - Paquet de 165g

Pate de figues 34%, farine de BLE 33%, sirop de sucre inverti, sucre, OEUFS, huile de colza, BEURRE patissier, amidon de BLE, fibres de chicoree, poudres a lever : carbonates de sodium et acide citrique. traces eventuelles de fruits a coque, soja et graines de sesame

Sultana framboise

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Biscuits sablés fourrés à la figue - x15 - Paquet de 165g or Sultana framboise?

Overall, Sultana framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sultana framboise has fewer calories: 371 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sultana framboise has less sugar: 25.5 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons