Bio sorbet vs La Charmeuse
Overall, La Charmeuse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio sorbet | La Charmeuse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 27.2 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- La Charmeuse has 40% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 126 kcal).
- La Charmeuse has 34% less sugar (18 g vs 27.2 g).
- Bio sorbet has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Bio sorbet
50% puréede fraisé, sucre de cannel, eau, sirop de glucosel déshydraté,jusde *concentré, stabilisants : farine de graines de caroube, pedines tissu de l'agriculture biologique. Traces éventuelles de lait, d'œuf, de soja, de fruits à coque et dlarachldesa
La Charmeuse
Purée de myrtille 45%, eau, sucre, infusion d'hibiscus 3%, gomme guar.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio sorbet or La Charmeuse?
Overall, La Charmeuse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
La Charmeuse has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La Charmeuse has less sugar: 18 g versus 27.2 g per 100 g.