Bigarreaux confits de provence vs Choco Orange
Overall, Bigarreaux confits de provence has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bigarreaux confits de proven... | Choco Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 409 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 56 g | 61 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.7 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bigarreaux confits de provence has 34% fewer calories (270 kcal vs 409 kcal).
- Bigarreaux confits de provence has 97% less fat (0.5 g vs 15 g).
- Bigarreaux confits de provence has 97% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 9 g).
- Choco Orange has 73% more fiber (3.7 g vs 1 g).
- Choco Orange has 68% more protein (3.1 g vs 1 g).
- Bigarreaux confits de provence has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bigarreaux confits de provence
Cerises bigarreaux entières (50%), sirop de glucose-fructose, jus concentré d'aronia et de carotte, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique.
Choco Orange
Naranja confitada: 50% (naranja, azúcar, jarabe de glucosa-fructosa, acidulante: ácido cítrico, conservadores (sorbato potásico, benzoato sódico), chocolate negro (azúcar, pasta de cacao, manteca de cacao, emulgentes (lecitinas, E-476), aroma).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bigarreaux confits de provence or Choco Orange?
Overall, Bigarreaux confits de provence has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bigarreaux confits de provence has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 409 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bigarreaux confits de provence has less sugar: 56 g versus 61 g per 100 g.