Comparison
Bifi kefyras vs 2.5% kefīrs
Overall, Bifi kefyras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bifi kefyras | 2.5% kefīrs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 51 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifi kefyras has 15% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Bifi kefyras has 12% less sugar (3.6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Bifi kefyras has 11% more protein (3.5 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Bifi kefyras
Pasterizuotas pienas, kefyrinis raugas, Bifidobacterium lactis.
2.5% kefīrs
kefīrs (_piens_, tīrkultūra)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bifi kefyras or 2.5% kefīrs?
Overall, Bifi kefyras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
2.5% kefīrs has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bifi kefyras has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.