Betteraves rouges en cubes vs Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado
Overall, Betteraves rouges en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Betteraves rouges en cubes
Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Betteraves rouges en cubes | Remolacha en tiras agridulce... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado has 34% less sugar (5.3 g vs 8 g).
- Betteraves rouges en cubes has 93% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Betteraves rouges en cubes has 24% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado has 67% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.6 g).
- Betteraves rouges en cubes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Betteraves rouges en cubes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Betteraves rouges en cubes
Betteraves rouges
Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado
Remolacha, vinagre de vino, azúcar y sal, "Sin Gluten", "Sin Lactosa", Producto listo para su consumo, Consumir dentro de los 8 dias después de la apertura,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Betteraves rouges en cubes or Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado?
Overall, Betteraves rouges en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Remolacha en tiras agridulce - Hacendado has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 8 g per 100 g.