Comparison

Beignets de viande vs Flamenquín york

Overall, Flamenquín york has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBeignets de viandeFlamenquín york
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 192 kcal 157 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 1 g
Sugars 3.4 g 3 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.6 g
Protein 7.2 g 9.2 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Flamenquín york has 18% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 192 kcal).
  • Flamenquín york has 15% less fat (2.8 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Flamenquín york has 12% less sugar (3 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Beignets de viande has 31% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Flamenquín york has 22% more protein (9.2 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Only Flamenquín york lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Beignets de viande

Not available.

Flamenquín york

Fiambre de magro de cerdo (38%) [carne de cerdo, agua, fécula de patata, sal, proteína de SOJA, proteína de LECHE, dextrosa de maíz, aromas, estabilizantes (difosfatos, carragenanos) y antioxidante (eritorbato sódico)], agua, pan rallado (harina de TRIGO (gluten), agua, sal, levadura, cúrcuma y pimentón), carne de cerdo (10 %), harina de TRIGO (gluten), proteina de SOJA, almidón de TRIGO (gluten), sal, ajo, fibra de guisante, aromas, dextrosa, lantas aromáticas, estabilizante (trifosfatos), potenciador de sabor (glutamato monosódico) y espesante (droxilpropil metil celulosa).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Beignets de viande or Flamenquín york?

Overall, Flamenquín york has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flamenquín york has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 192 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Flamenquín york has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons