Comparison

Bcaa Amino-Hydrate vs Bcaa 2:1:1

Overall, Bcaa Amino-Hydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBcaa Amino-HydrateBcaa 2:1:1
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 320 kcal 402 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 7 g
Saturated fat 0 g 4.1 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0.3 g
Salt 4 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0.2 g —
Protein 68.8 g 77.8 g
Additives70
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bcaa Amino-Hydrate has 20% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 402 kcal).
  • Bcaa Amino-Hydrate has 96% less fat (0.3 g vs 7 g).
  • Bcaa Amino-Hydrate has no saturated fat, while Bcaa 2:1:1 has 4.1 g.
  • Bcaa 2:1:1 has 45% less salt (2.2 g vs 4 g).
  • Bcaa 2:1:1 has 12% more protein (77.8 g vs 68.8 g).
  • Only Bcaa Amino-Hydrate lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Bcaa Amino-Hydrate

BCAA (2.1.1) (L-leucine, L-isoleucin, L-valine), L-glutamine, I-citrulline Dl-malate 2:1, Maltodextrin, Tri Sodium Citrate, Tri Potassium Citrate, Anti-caking Agents (Tri Calcium Phosphate, Silicon Dioxide), Flavour, Acid (Citric Acid), Sodium Chloride, Sweeteners (Acesulfarne K, Sucralose), Emulsifier (Soy Lecithin)), Natural Colouring Agent (Curcumin), Vitamin (Vitamin 86 Pyridoxin HCI). ...a... Ail and their use

Bcaa 2:1:1

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bcaa Amino-Hydrate or Bcaa 2:1:1?

Overall, Bcaa Amino-Hydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bcaa Amino-Hydrate has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 402 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bcaa 2:1:1 has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons