Comparison
Bcaa 2:1:1 vs Bcaa Amino
Overall, Bcaa Amino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bcaa 2:1:1 | Bcaa Amino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 402 kcal | 213 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 77.8 g | 50.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bcaa Amino has 47% fewer calories (213 kcal vs 402 kcal).
- Bcaa Amino has 99% less fat (0.1 g vs 7 g).
- Bcaa Amino has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 4.1 g).
- Bcaa 2:1:1 has 88% less sugar (0.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Bcaa Amino has 87% less salt (0.3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Bcaa 2:1:1 has 36% more protein (77.8 g vs 50.1 g).
Ingredients
Bcaa 2:1:1
Not available.
Bcaa Amino
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bcaa 2:1:1 or Bcaa Amino?
Overall, Bcaa Amino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bcaa Amino has fewer calories: 213 kcal versus 402 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bcaa 2:1:1 has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.