Barre de fruits pomme-banane vs Mousse mela fragola
Overall, Mousse mela fragola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barre de fruits pomme-banane | Mousse mela fragola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 46 g | 9.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mousse mela fragola has 85% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 360 kcal).
- Mousse mela fragola has no fat, while Barre de fruits pomme-banane has 6 g.
- Mousse mela fragola has no saturated fat, while Barre de fruits pomme-banane has 2.3 g.
- Mousse mela fragola has 79% less sugar (9.6 g vs 46 g).
- Barre de fruits pomme-banane has 43% more fiber (3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Barre de fruits pomme-banane has 100% more protein (3 g vs 0 g).
- Mousse mela fragola has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Barre de fruits pomme-banane
Flocons de bananes (38,3%), jus de pommes concentré (37,3%), flocons d'avoine (6%) oléine de palme, flocons de mais 15%), farine de riz partiellement hydrolysée (3%), pain azyme (fécule de pomme de terre, eau, huile de palme, maltodextrine, citrate de calcium, pyrophosphate de fer.
Mousse mela fragola
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barre de fruits pomme-banane or Mousse mela fragola?
Overall, Mousse mela fragola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mousse mela fragola has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mousse mela fragola has less sugar: 9.6 g versus 46 g per 100 g.