Barber’s cruncher red leceister vs Queso Azul Natural
Overall, Queso Azul Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barber’s cruncher red leceis... | Queso Azul Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 399 kcal | 331 kcal |
| Fat | 33.7 g | 28.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.1 g | 18.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 23.8 g | 19.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Queso Azul Natural has 17% fewer calories (331 kcal vs 399 kcal).
- Queso Azul Natural has 17% less fat (28.1 g vs 33.7 g).
- Queso Azul Natural has 14% less saturated fat (18.1 g vs 21.1 g).
- Queso Azul Natural has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Barber’s cruncher red leceister has 51% less salt (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
- Barber’s cruncher red leceister has 18% more protein (23.8 g vs 19.4 g).
- Barber’s cruncher red leceister has the better Nutri-Score.
- Queso Azul Natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Barber’s cruncher red leceister
Red Leicester Cheese (Cows' Milk) Colour: Annatto Norbixin
Queso Azul Natural
Latte vaccino, sale, fermenti lattici, caglio microbico, colture selezionate di muffe blu. Crosta edibile. Senza glutine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barber’s cruncher red leceister or Queso Azul Natural?
Overall, Queso Azul Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Queso Azul Natural has fewer calories: 331 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Queso Azul Natural has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.