Comparison

Baci di Dama vs Baci di dama

Overall, Baci di Dama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBaci di DamaBaci di dama
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 562 kcal 551 kcal
Fat 35 g 34 g
Saturated fat 18 g 15 g
Sugars 24 g 27 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 3.3 g 3.3 g
Protein 7.7 g 6.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Milk, Mustard, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Baci di dama has 17% less saturated fat (15 g vs 18 g).
  • Baci di Dama has 11% less sugar (24 g vs 27 g).
  • Baci di Dama has 10% more protein (7.7 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Baci di Dama is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Baci di Dama lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Baci di Dama

farina di grano tenero di tipo "00", zucchero, burro anidro, mandorle 16%, cioccolato fondente 7,5% (pasta di cacao, zucchero, burro di cacao, emulsionanti: lecitina di soia, estratto di vaniglia), estratto di vaniglia. Cacao: 70% minimo nel cioccolato. Può contenere: nocciole, piatacchi, noci e senape.

Baci di dama

Weizenmehl Typ "00", Zucker, Butter (Milch), geröstete Haselnüsse 17%, dunkle Schokolade 12% [Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Emulgator (Sojalecithin), natürliches Vanillearoma], Haselnusspaste 3%, Kakaopulver 1%. Kann Nüsse, Mandeln, Pistazien, Eier und Senf enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Baci di Dama or Baci di dama?

Overall, Baci di Dama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Baci di dama has fewer calories: 551 kcal versus 562 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baci di Dama has less sugar: 24 g versus 27 g per 100 g.

More comparisons