Baci di Dama vs Baci di dama
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baci di Dama | Baci di dama |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 543 kcal | 551 kcal |
| Fat | 34.4 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.4 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 26.4 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Only Baci di dama lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Baci di Dama
Not available.
Baci di dama
Weizenmehl Typ "00", Zucker, Butter (Milch), geröstete Haselnüsse 17%, dunkle Schokolade 12% [Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Emulgator (Sojalecithin), natürliches Vanillearoma], Haselnusspaste 3%, Kakaopulver 1%. Kann Nüsse, Mandeln, Pistazien, Eier und Senf enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baci di Dama or Baci di dama?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baci di Dama has fewer calories: 543 kcal versus 551 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baci di Dama has less sugar: 26.4 g versus 27 g per 100 g.