Baci di Dama vs Baci di dama
Overall, Baci di dama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baci di Dama | Baci di dama |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 543 kcal | 527 kcal |
| Fat | 34.4 g | 33.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.4 g | 14.3 g |
| Sugars | 26.4 g | 19.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baci di dama has 13% less saturated fat (14.3 g vs 16.4 g).
- Baci di dama has 27% less sugar (19.3 g vs 26.4 g).
- Only Baci di dama lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Baci di Dama
Not available.
Baci di dama
Farina di grano tenero tipo "00", burro, nocciole 15% varietà Tonda Gentile Trilobata, Zucchero, Cioccolato (cacao min 54%) (pasta di cacao, zucchero, burro di cacao, emulsionante: lecitina di soia E322, aroma naturale di vaniglia), mandorle, miele millefiori. Allergeni: glutine, derivati del latte, frutta a guscio (nocciole e mandorle), soia. Può contenere tracce di: frutta a guscio (noci), sesamo, uova.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baci di Dama or Baci di dama?
Overall, Baci di dama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baci di dama has fewer calories: 527 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baci di dama has less sugar: 19.3 g versus 26.4 g per 100 g.