Ass.lap / Can / Poul.Dec.125G, vs Vårkänsla
Overall, Vårkänsla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ass.lap / Can / Poul.Dec.125... | Vårkänsla |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 542 kcal | 535 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 56 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vårkänsla has 10% less saturated fat (18 g vs 20 g).
- Vårkänsla has 18% more protein (7.3 g vs 6 g).
- Only Vårkänsla lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Ass.lap / Can / Poul.Dec.125G,
Not available.
Vårkänsla
Zucker, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Vollmilchpulver, Magermilchpulver, Lactosepulver, Butterreinfett, Emulgator (E322), natürliches Aroma. Kakao: 30 %
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ass.lap / Can / Poul.Dec.125G, or Vårkänsla?
Overall, Vårkänsla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vårkänsla has fewer calories: 535 kcal versus 542 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ass.lap / Can / Poul.Dec.125G, has less sugar: 56 g versus 57 g per 100 g.