Comparison

Arrabbiata vs Sauce tomate à l'Arrabbiata

Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientArrabbiataSauce tomate à l'Arrabbiata
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 59 kcal 160 kcal
Fat 2 g 11 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 1.4 g
Sugars 6.2 g 8.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber 1.4 g 3.4 g
Protein 1.7 g 2.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Arrabbiata has 63% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 160 kcal).
  • Arrabbiata has 82% less fat (2 g vs 11 g).
  • Arrabbiata has 79% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Arrabbiata has 27% less sugar (6.2 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Sauce tomate à l'Arrabbiata has 59% more fiber (3.4 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Sauce tomate à l'Arrabbiata has 32% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Arrabbiata has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Arrabbiata is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Arrabbiata

Pulpe de tomates avec morceaux 71%, concentré de tomates 12%, eau, huile d'olive, poivrons rouges 1,5%, sucre, sel, amidon, ail, plantes aromatiques (dont thym 0,075%), extrait de légumes, piment rouge 0,1%.

Sauce tomate à l'Arrabbiata

Eau, double concentrée de tomate (33.2%), huile de tournesol, flocon de tomates, oignons (4%), sel, dextrose, amidon de maïs, huile d'olive vièrge extra (0.5%), basilic, piment en poudre, ail, arôme naturel, sucre, piment (0.04%), poivre, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Arrabbiata or Sauce tomate à l'Arrabbiata?

Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Arrabbiata has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Arrabbiata has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons