Comparison

Arándano Natures Heart® X vs Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro

Overall, Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientArándano Natures Heart® XMix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Neg...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 1
Calories 346 kcal 642 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 54 g
Saturated fat 0 g 7.5 g
Sugars 68 g 0.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 4.6 g 13 g
Protein 0 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Arándano Natures Heart® X has 46% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 642 kcal).
  • Arándano Natures Heart® X has 99% less fat (0.8 g vs 54 g).
  • Arándano Natures Heart® X has no saturated fat, while Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has 7.5 g.
  • Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has 100% less sugar (0.2 g vs 68 g).
  • Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has 65% more fiber (13 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has 100% more protein (19 g vs 0 g).
  • Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro lists: Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Arándano Natures Heart® X

Not available.

Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro

Ajonjolí negro y ajonjolí blanco. Este producto contiene sésamo. Empacado en una línea de producción que procesa huevos, soja, frutos de cáscara y granos de sésamo.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Arándano Natures Heart® X or Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro?

Overall, Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Arándano Natures Heart® X has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 642 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mix de Ajonjolí Blanco y Negro has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 68 g per 100 g.

More comparisons