Apple + Elderflower vs Vitamin Aqua Focus B+
Overall, Apple + Elderflower has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Apple + Elderflower | Vitamin Aqua Focus B+ |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 8 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apple + Elderflower has 50% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 14 kcal).
- Vitamin Aqua Focus B+ has no fat, while Apple + Elderflower has 0.5 g.
- Apple + Elderflower has 61% less sugar (1.3 g vs 3.3 g).
- Apple + Elderflower has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Apple + Elderflower
Water, apple juice from concentrate (12%) flavouring: natural elderflower and other flavours, antioxidant: ascorbic acid, stabilisers gum arabic and glycerol esters of wood rosins, sweeter Sucralose, vitamin blend: vitamin C, niacin, pantothenic acid, vitamin B6, vitamin B1, folic acid, biotin, vitamin B12; natural colours: copper complexes of chlorophylls, copper complexes of chlorophyllines and sulphite ammonia caramel. Maté tea, L-carnitine and citric acid.
Vitamin Aqua Focus B+
US Informatii Nutritionale pentru 100 ml băutură răcoritoare Valoare Energetică 59kJ/
FAQ
Which is healthier: Apple + Elderflower or Vitamin Aqua Focus B+?
Overall, Apple + Elderflower has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apple + Elderflower has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apple + Elderflower has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.