Comparison

Apfelschorle vs Bio-Apfelschorle trüb

Overall, Apfelschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientApfelschorleBio-Apfelschorle trüb
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 24 kcal 27 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 5.2 g 6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.2 g
Additives12
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Apfelschorle has 13% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6 g).

Ingredients

Apfelschorle

Apfelsaft aus Apfelsaftkonzentrat (50%), natürliches Mineralwasser, Kohlensäure, natürliches Apfelsaftaroma, Zitronensaftkonzentrat.

Bio-Apfelschorle trüb

Natürliches Mineralwasser, naturtrüber Apfelsaft¹, Apfelsaft aus Apfelsaftkonzentrat¹, Kohlensäure, natürliches Apfelaroma, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure. ¹aus kontrolliert ökologischem Anbau.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Apfelschorle or Bio-Apfelschorle trüb?

Overall, Apfelschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Apfelschorle has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Apfelschorle has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons