Comparison

Amigo strawberry vs Nestea forest fruits

Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientAmigo strawberryNestea forest fruits
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 34 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 8.5 g 4.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nestea forest fruits has 44% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 34 kcal).
  • Amigo strawberry has no fat, while Nestea forest fruits has 0.5 g.
  • Nestea forest fruits has 47% less sugar (4.5 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Nestea forest fruits has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Amigo strawberry

Hestor9 SuRE fntdink made of md etmct 400

Nestea forest fruits

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Amigo strawberry or Nestea forest fruits?

Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nestea forest fruits has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nestea forest fruits has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons