Comparison

Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale vs Amavè - amatriciana 100% vegetale

Overall, Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAmatriciana - Tomates et gua...Amavè - amatriciana 100% veg...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 107 kcal 153 kcal
Fat 7 g 13.4 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1 g
Sugars 3 g 3.4 g
Salt 0.7 g 1 g
Protein 3 g 3.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 30% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 153 kcal).
  • Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 48% less fat (7 g vs 13.4 g).
  • Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 12% less sugar (3 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has 30% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Amavè - amatriciana 100% vegetale has 17% more protein (3.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Only Amavè - amatriciana 100% vegetale lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale

Not available.

Amavè - amatriciana 100% vegetale

passata di pomodoro 29%, semiconcentrato di pomodoro 22%, tofu 15% (SOIA, acqua, olio di semi di girasole, cloruro di magnesio), cipolla, olio di semi di girasole, vino bianco, salsa di SOIA (acqua, fagioli di SOIA), sale, paprika affumicata, succo di limone, affumicatore

FAQ

Which is healthier: Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale or Amavè - amatriciana 100% vegetale?

Overall, Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Amatriciana - Tomates et guanciale has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons