Amarene al cioccolato vs Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente
Overall, Amarene al cioccolato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Amarene al cioccolato
Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amarene al cioccolato | Ciliegie amarane ricoperte d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 416 kcal | 435 kcal |
| Fat | 16.6 g | 15.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 62 g | 71.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amarene al cioccolato has 14% less sugar (62 g vs 71.7 g).
- Amarene al cioccolato has 42% more protein (3.1 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Amarene al cioccolato
Not available.
Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amarene al cioccolato or Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente?
Overall, Amarene al cioccolato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amarene al cioccolato has fewer calories: 416 kcal versus 435 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amarene al cioccolato has less sugar: 62 g versus 71.7 g per 100 g.