Chocolat fruits vs Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente
Overall, Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Chocolat fruits
Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat fruits | Ciliegie amarane ricoperte d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 548 kcal | 435 kcal |
| Fat | 31.3 g | 15.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 18.9 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 48.8 g | 71.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente has 21% fewer calories (435 kcal vs 548 kcal).
- Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente has 50% less fat (15.7 g vs 31.3 g).
- Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente has 48% less saturated fat (9.9 g vs 18.9 g).
- Chocolat fruits has 32% less sugar (48.8 g vs 71.7 g).
- Chocolat fruits has 57% more protein (4.2 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Chocolat fruits
Not available.
Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat fruits or Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente?
Overall, Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ciliegie amarane ricoperte di cioccolato fondente has fewer calories: 435 kcal versus 548 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat fruits has less sugar: 48.8 g versus 71.7 g per 100 g.