Amandes en poudre vs Amandes en poudre
Overall, Amandes en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amandes en poudre | Amandes en poudre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 664 kcal | 613 kcal |
| Fat | 56 g | 53 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.9 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amandes en poudre has 11% less saturated fat (4 g vs 4.5 g).
- Amandes en poudre has 20% more fiber (9.9 g vs 7.9 g).
- Amandes en poudre has 16% more protein (25 g vs 21 g).
Ingredients
Amandes en poudre
_Amandes_ en poudre.
Amandes en poudre
Amande.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amandes en poudre or Amandes en poudre?
Overall, Amandes en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amandes en poudre has fewer calories: 613 kcal versus 664 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amandes en poudre has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.