Comparison

Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon vs Aceitunas Floresur Rellena De Pimiento

Overall, Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlcachofas Alfa Vegetales Co...Aceitunas Floresur Rellena D...
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group — —
Calories 50 kcal 156 kcal
Fat 0 g 14 g
Saturated fat 0 g 3 g
Sugars 1 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 4 g
Fiber 4 g 2.5 g
Protein 2 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has 68% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 156 kcal).
  • Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has no fat, while Aceitunas Floresur Rellena De Pimiento has 14 g.
  • Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has no saturated fat, while Aceitunas Floresur Rellena De Pimiento has 3 g.
  • Aceitunas Floresur Rellena De Pimiento has no sugar, while Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has 1 g.
  • Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has 81% less salt (0.8 g vs 4 g).
  • Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has 38% more fiber (4 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has 50% more protein (2 g vs 1 g).
  • Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon

Not available.

Aceitunas Floresur Rellena De Pimiento

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon or Aceitunas Floresur Rellena De Pimiento?

Overall, Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alcachofas Alfa Vegetales Corazon has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 156 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aceitunas Floresur Rellena De Pimiento has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons