Comparison
Ail vs Knoflookpoeder
Overall, Knoflookpoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ail | Knoflookpoeder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 331 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 16.6 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Knoflookpoeder has 66% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 331 kcal).
- Knoflookpoeder has 64% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Knoflookpoeder has 50% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Ail has 36% more fiber (9 g vs 5.8 g).
- Ail has 68% more protein (16.6 g vs 5.3 g).
Ingredients
Ail
Not available.
Knoflookpoeder
knoflookpoeder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ail or Knoflookpoeder?
Overall, Knoflookpoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Knoflookpoeder has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knoflookpoeder has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.