Comparison
Ail semoule vs Knoflookpoeder
Overall, Knoflookpoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ail semoule | Knoflookpoeder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 344 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.5 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Knoflookpoeder has 68% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 344 kcal).
- Knoflookpoeder has 68% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Knoflookpoeder has 51% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Ail semoule has 39% more fiber (9.5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Ail semoule has 68% more protein (16.7 g vs 5.3 g).
Ingredients
Ail semoule
Ail déshydraté.
Knoflookpoeder
knoflookpoeder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ail semoule or Knoflookpoeder?
Overall, Knoflookpoeder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Knoflookpoeder has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knoflookpoeder has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.