Comparison
Acelgas vs Bieta al naturale
Overall, Bieta al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Acelgas | Bieta al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acelgas has 41% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 17 kcal).
- Bieta al naturale has no fat, while Acelgas has 0.5 g.
- Acelgas has 76% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Bieta al naturale has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Bieta al naturale has 53% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Acelgas
Not available.
Bieta al naturale
Bietola
FAQ
Which is healthier: Acelgas or Bieta al naturale?
Overall, Bieta al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acelgas has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 17 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acelgas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.