Comparison

6 coupes à garnir parfum chocolat vs Waffle Cones

Overall, Waffle Cones has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient6 coupes à garnir parfum cho...Waffle Cones
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 479 kcal 407 kcal
Fat 19.2 g 5.7 g
Saturated fat 17 g 3.9 g
Sugars 38.2 g 27.9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.4 g
Fiber 3.3 g 3.2 g
Protein 5.7 g 6.9 g
Additives42
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Waffle Cones has 15% fewer calories (407 kcal vs 479 kcal).
  • Waffle Cones has 70% less fat (5.7 g vs 19.2 g).
  • Waffle Cones has 77% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 17 g).
  • Waffle Cones has 27% less sugar (27.9 g vs 38.2 g).
  • Waffle Cones has 17% more protein (6.9 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Waffle Cones has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

6 coupes à garnir parfum chocolat

Pâte à glacer (sucre, graisse végétale de palmiste, cacao maigre en poudre (6,7%), émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol), farine de blé (GLUTEN), sucre, huiles et graisses végétales (coprah), émulsifiant lécithine de SOJA, caramel (sucre, eau, sirop de glucose-fructose), jaune d'CEUF en poudre, poudre à lever : bicarbonate de sodium, sel. Peut contenir des traces de : LAIT, FRUITS A COQUE.

Waffle Cones

Wheat Flour, Sugar, Coconut Oil, Wheat Fibre, Emulsifier: Soya Lecithins; Salt, Raising Agent: Sodium Carbonates; Flavouring. Allergy Advice

FAQ

Which is healthier: 6 coupes à garnir parfum chocolat or Waffle Cones?

Overall, Waffle Cones has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Waffle Cones has fewer calories: 407 kcal versus 479 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Waffle Cones has less sugar: 27.9 g versus 38.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons