275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo vs Polka
Overall, 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo | Polka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 51 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 11 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo has 58% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo has 75% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo has 18% more protein (5.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Polka lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo
sirop de glucose; sucre; gélatine;dextrose, acidifiants: acide citrique, acide malique; agent d'enrobage: cire de carnauba; correcteurs d'acidité: citrate tricalcique, malate acide de sodium; arôme; concentrés de fruits et de plantes: carthame, spiruline, pomme, patate douce, radis; colorants: carotènes végétaux, lutéine, anthoganes.
Polka
Sirop de glucose; sucre; sirop de sucre mélassé; farine de blé; dextrose; gélatine; amidon; extrait de réglisse; maltodextrine; graisse de palme; acidifiant: acide citrique; sel; arôme; concentrés de fruits et de plantes: carthame, spiruline, pomme, radis, cassis, citron, betterave rouge; sirop de sucre inverti; colorants: curcumine, carotènes végétaux, lutéine, anthocyanes; agents d'enrobage: cire d'abeille blanche et jaune.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo or Polka?
Overall, 275G Haribo Croco Pik Haribo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polka has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polka has less sugar: 49 g versus 51 g per 100 g.