Comparison

2 Panés façon milanaise vs Schweine Schnitzel

Overall, Schweine Schnitzel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient2 Panés façon milanaiseSchweine Schnitzel
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 245 kcal 220 kcal
Fat 14 g 10 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 1.3 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0.2 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.3 g
Fiber 3 g 1.2 g
Protein 14 g 19 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Schweine Schnitzel has 10% fewer calories (220 kcal vs 245 kcal).
  • Schweine Schnitzel has 29% less fat (10 g vs 14 g).
  • Schweine Schnitzel has 50% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Schweine Schnitzel has 86% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.4 g).
  • 2 Panés façon milanaise has 59% more fiber (3 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Schweine Schnitzel has 26% more protein (19 g vs 14 g).

Ingredients

2 Panés façon milanaise

Ingrédients (à la mise en œuvre) : Viande de volaille traitée en salaison 73% (viande de poulet origine France : 37%, viande de dinde origine France 19%, eau, fibre de BLÉ, dextrose de blé, sel, arôme naturel, panure aromatisée au citron 27% (eau, farine de BLÉ, GLUTEN de BLÉ, levure, sel, épices, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, persil, arôme, huile et arôme de citron: 0,1%). Huile de tournesol. Peut contenir des traces de lait.

Schweine Schnitzel

Schweinefleisch* 74%, _Weizenmehl_, Rapsöl, _Weizenstärke_, Speisesalz, Glukosesirup, Gewürze, Hefe

FAQ

Which is healthier: 2 Panés façon milanaise or Schweine Schnitzel?

Overall, Schweine Schnitzel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Schweine Schnitzel has fewer calories: 220 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schweine Schnitzel has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons