1848 vs NESQUIK Moins de Sucres
Overall, NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 1848 | NESQUIK Moins de Sucres |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 48.5 g | 6.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 16.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 81% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 69% less fat (1.9 g vs 6.2 g).
- NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 71% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 3.8 g).
- NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 87% less sugar (6.3 g vs 48.5 g).
- 1848 has 88% more fiber (16.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- 1848 has 68% more protein (12 g vs 3.8 g).
- NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only NESQUIK Moins de Sucres lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
1848
Cacao maigre (11 % de beurre de cacao) en poudre (50%), sucre, arôme. Peut contenir lait et soja.
NESQUIK Moins de Sucres
low-fat cocoa powder (28%), soluble corn fibre, sugars, oat flour**, emulsifier (soy lecithin), natural flavours, vitamins (c, d), cinnamon, **gluten free,
FAQ
Which is healthier: 1848 or NESQUIK Moins de Sucres?
Overall, NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has less sugar: 6.3 g versus 48.5 g per 100 g.