Comparison

1848 Chocolat en poudre vs NESQUIK Moins de Sucres

Overall, NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient1848 Chocolat en poudreNESQUIK Moins de Sucres
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 148 kcal 68 kcal
Fat 4 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 1.1 g
Sugars 17 g 6.3 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 1.9 g
Protein 8.4 g 3.8 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 54% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 148 kcal).
  • NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 53% less fat (1.9 g vs 4 g).
  • NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 54% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.4 g).
  • NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has 63% less sugar (6.3 g vs 17 g).
  • 1848 Chocolat en poudre has 24% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.9 g).
  • 1848 Chocolat en poudre has 55% more protein (8.4 g vs 3.8 g).
  • NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only NESQUIK Moins de Sucres lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

1848 Chocolat en poudre

Cacao maigre en poudre (50%) (beurre de cacao (11%)), sucre, arôme. Peut contenir lait et soja.

NESQUIK Moins de Sucres

low-fat cocoa powder (28%), soluble corn fibre, sugars, oat flour**, emulsifier (soy lecithin), natural flavours, vitamins (c, d), cinnamon, **gluten free,

FAQ

Which is healthier: 1848 Chocolat en poudre or NESQUIK Moins de Sucres?

Overall, NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

NESQUIK Moins de Sucres has less sugar: 6.3 g versus 17 g per 100 g.

More comparisons