1848 Chocolat en poudre vs Nesquik
Overall, Nesquik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 1848 Chocolat en poudre | Nesquik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 9.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nesquik has 51% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 148 kcal).
- Nesquik has 55% less fat (1.8 g vs 4 g).
- Nesquik has 54% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- Nesquik has 44% less sugar (9.5 g vs 17 g).
- 1848 Chocolat en poudre has 80% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0.5 g).
- 1848 Chocolat en poudre has 57% more protein (8.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Nesquik has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Nesquik lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
1848 Chocolat en poudre
Cacao maigre en poudre (50%) (beurre de cacao (11%)), sucre, arôme. Peut contenir lait et soja.
Nesquik
Sucre, cacao maigre en poudre* (23%), émulsifiant : lécithine de SOJA, sel, vitamines (C, D), arôme naturel, cannelle. *Bilan massique certifié Rainforest Alliance www.ra.org/fr
FAQ
Which is healthier: 1848 Chocolat en poudre or Nesquik?
Overall, Nesquik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nesquik has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nesquik has less sugar: 9.5 g versus 17 g per 100 g.