1848 vs Nesquik
Overall, Nesquik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 1848 | Nesquik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 48.5 g | 9.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 16.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nesquik has 80% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Nesquik has 71% less fat (1.8 g vs 6.2 g).
- Nesquik has 71% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 3.8 g).
- Nesquik has 80% less sugar (9.5 g vs 48.5 g).
- 1848 has 97% more fiber (16.5 g vs 0.5 g).
- 1848 has 70% more protein (12 g vs 3.6 g).
- Nesquik has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Nesquik lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
1848
Cacao maigre (11 % de beurre de cacao) en poudre (50%), sucre, arôme. Peut contenir lait et soja.
Nesquik
Sucre, cacao maigre en poudre* (23%), émulsifiant : lécithine de SOJA, sel, vitamines (C, D), arôme naturel, cannelle. *Bilan massique certifié Rainforest Alliance www.ra.org/fr
FAQ
Which is healthier: 1848 or Nesquik?
Overall, Nesquik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nesquik has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nesquik has less sugar: 9.5 g versus 48.5 g per 100 g.