Comparison

100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties vs Hamburguesa natural de vacuno

Overall, 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient100% Grass-Fed Beef PattiesHamburguesa natural de vacun...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 252 kcal 213 kcal
Fat 19.9 g 15 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 7.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 17.2 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has 15% fewer calories (213 kcal vs 252 kcal).
  • Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has 25% less fat (15 g vs 19.9 g).
  • 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has no sugar, while Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has 0.5 g.
  • 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has 86% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties

100% grass fed beef

Hamburguesa natural de vacuno

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties or Hamburguesa natural de vacuno?

Overall, 100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hamburguesa natural de vacuno has fewer calories: 213 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

100% Grass-Fed Beef Patties has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons