0049387100118 vs Sabanitas burger
Overall, 0049387100118 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 0049387100118 | Sabanitas burger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 255 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 12.7 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 0049387100118 has 74% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 255 kcal).
- 0049387100118 has 82% less fat (3.3 g vs 19 g).
- 0049387100118 has 84% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 12.7 g).
- 0049387100118 has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Sabanitas burger has 73% more protein (12.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Sabanitas burger lists: Milk.
Ingredients
0049387100118
Milk with vitamin d3 added.
Sabanitas burger
queso cheddar 25%, mantaquilla, leche en polvo desnatada, almidon modificado, proteina de leche, E452, E331, sal, aroma lacteo natural, E202, E160c, E160ai,
FAQ
Which is healthier: 0049387100118 or Sabanitas burger?
Overall, 0049387100118 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
0049387100118 has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
0049387100118 has less sugar: 5 g versus 5 g per 100 g.