Nutrition report ready

Wurstel pollo e tacchino

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Conad product.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Wurstel pollo e tacchino

by Conad 100 g in Sausages Barcode 8003170021617
Bad nutritional quality

Wurstel pollo e tacchino by Conad provides 226 kcal per 100 g, with 0.8 g of sugars and 14 g of protein. That is 34% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Sausages category and comes in a 100 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
18 g · High
Saturated fat
5.2 g · High
Sugars
0.8 g · Low
Salt
2.5 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 226 kcal 276 −18%
Total fat 18 g 22.4 −20%
Saturated fat 5.2 g 8.4 −38%
Carbohydrates 2 g 2.9 −32%
Total sugars 0.8 g 1.2 −34%
Protein 14 g 15.8 −11%
Salt 2.5 g 2.2 +12%

Category average across 6775 Sausages products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sausages

Calories lower 25%
Sugars lower 50%
Salt higher 23%
Saturated fat lower 19%
Protein top 60%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
100 g
Sold in
Italy
Barcode
8003170021617

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Wurstel pollo e tacchino?

Wurstel pollo e tacchino contains 226 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Wurstel pollo e tacchino?

Wurstel pollo e tacchino has 0.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Wurstel pollo e tacchino healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Wurstel pollo e tacchino? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sausages

View all →

More from Conad

View all →