View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Scharrel Kipreepjes Pittig
Scharrel Kipreepjes Pittig by Gulden hoeve provides 109 kcal per 100 g, with 2.3 g of sugars and 21 g of protein. That is 23% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Chicken and its products category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 portion (190 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 109 kcal | 207 kcal | 172 −36% | |
| Total fat | 1.7 g | 3.2 g | 4% | 8.4 −80% |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1 g | 5% | 2.2 −78% |
| Carbohydrates | 2.6 g | 4.9 g | 2% | 6.2 −58% |
| Total sugars | 2.3 g | 4.4 g | 1.9 +23% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.8 −100% |
| Protein | 21 g | 39.9 g | 80% | 17.5 +20% |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.5 g | 1.3 −36% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 161 Chicken and its products products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other chicken and its products
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Serving size
- 1 portion (190 g)
- Labels & certifications
- Beter levenBeter leven 1 ster
- Sold in
- Netherlands
- Barcode
- 2323818604245
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Scharrel Kipreepjes Pittig?
Scharrel Kipreepjes Pittig contains 109 kcal per 100 g and about 207 kcal per serving (1 portion (190 g)).
How much sugar is in Scharrel Kipreepjes Pittig?
Scharrel Kipreepjes Pittig has 2.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Scharrel Kipreepjes Pittig healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated December 3, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3 
a 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 More chicken and its products
View all →
b NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4