View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Rundesaucijs
Rundesaucijs provides 233 kcal per 100 g, with 0.3 g of sugars and 16.3 g of protein. That is 50% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Beef category and comes in a 0.4 kg pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 kcal | 171 +36% |
| Total fat | 17.1 g | 9 +90% |
| Saturated fat | 8.1 g | 3.6 +124% |
| Carbohydrates | 3.5 g | 1.5 +127% |
| Total sugars | 0.3 g | 0.6 −50% |
| Dietary fiber | 0.2 g | 0.2 −17% |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 21 −22% |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 +15% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1307 Beef products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other beef
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Rundvlees (85%), water, aardappelzetmeel, rijstebloem, zout, gedroogde glucosestroop, specerijen, stabilisator (E412, E460), geleermiddel (E401), natuurlijk aroma, maltodextrine, tomatenpoeder, conserveermiddel (E267), aardappelvezel, antioxidant (E300), rook - aroma.
Additives 4
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 0.4 kg
- Sold in
- Netherlands
- Barcode
- 8713279032260
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Rundesaucijs?
Rundesaucijs contains 233 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Rundesaucijs?
Rundesaucijs has 0.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Rundesaucijs healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Rundesaucijs vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 8, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 More beef
View all →
NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b 
c NOVA 4