Rundergehakt

in Ground beef preparations Barcode 2336625803510
Poor nutritional quality
Ultra-processed food

Rundergehakt provides 251 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 16.8 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Ground beef preparations category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
19.7 g · High
Saturated fat
7.6 g · High
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
0.6 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 251 kcal 216 +16%
Total fat 19.7 g 15.6 +27%
Saturated fat 7.6 g 6.6 +15%
Carbohydrates 0 g 1.1 −99%
Total sugars 0 g 0.4 −100%
Protein 16.8 g 17.5
Salt 0.6 g 0.6

Category average across 203 Ground beef preparations products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other ground beef preparations

Calories higher 18%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt higher 39%
Saturated fat higher 32%
Protein top 62%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

(99%) rundvlees, natuurlijk aroma

Palm oil freeNot veganNot vegetarian

Product details

Sold in
Netherlands
Barcode
2336625803510

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Rundergehakt?

Rundergehakt contains 251 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Rundergehakt?

Rundergehakt has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Rundergehakt healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Is Rundergehakt vegan?

Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 7, 2022. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Rundergehakt? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More ground beef preparations

View all →