View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Römerquelle Kruška Matičnjak
Prirodna mineralna voda ni sirup,
Römerquelle Kruška Matičnjak by romerquelle provides 18 kcal per 100 ml, with 4.2 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 84% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Flavored waters category and comes in a 330 ml pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 ml
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 ml | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 18 kcal | 10 +79% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 4.2 g | 2.4 +77% |
| Total sugars | 4.2 g | 2.3 +84% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 −85% |
*% Daily Value for 100 ml, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 488 Flavored waters products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other flavored waters
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
sok od kruške od koncentriranoga soka (3 %), ugljikov dioksid, kiselina: limunska kiselina, prirodne arome, ekstrakt matičnjaka, antioksidans: askorbinska kiselina, konzervans: dimetil dikarbonat.
Additives 4
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 330 ml
- Sold in
- Croatia
- Barcode
- 87126778
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Römerquelle Kruška Matičnjak?
Römerquelle Kruška Matičnjak contains 18 kcal per 100 ml.
How much sugar is in Römerquelle Kruška Matičnjak?
Römerquelle Kruška Matičnjak has 4.2 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Römerquelle Kruška Matičnjak healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated July 25, 2023. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 3 
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 More flavored waters
View all →
NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
c More from romerquelle
View all →
a NOVA 1 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1